spacer C4DT

Dear Reader,

 

The C4DT weekly newsletter brings you a selection of articles or books that interested us.

 

Enjoy reading!

C4DT Team

spacer C4DT
Weekly Picks
spacer C4DT

Businesses scramble to get noticed by AI search

BBC — 07/04/2026

Imad's take

"

From Search Engine Optimisation (SEO), to Answer Engine Optimisation (AEO) - also sometimes called Generative Engine Optimisation (GEO), it's interesting to notice how much we rely on specific tools to "see the world". With search engines, we had to scroll down the results and decide ourselves which links were relevant (and still feared how much Google can influence us). Now, using the latter, we just find what AI wants us to see. Less scrolling, less choices, less clicks, more convenience. I'm wondering whether news websites will follow sales websites in optimizing for AI rather than for human readers.

Nations priced out of Big AI are building with frugal models

Rest of World — 02/04/2026

Olivier's take

"

I am pleased to see such vibrant ecosystems emerging outside of the USA and China. The cost of tokenisation tends to exclude non-English queries, whereas frugal models reduce costs, promote local autonomy and can operate offline on basic hardware. Developing local expertise in creating bespoke solutions for sectors such as agriculture, healthcare and indigenous languages could produce sustainable, energy-efficient AI that caters for the needs of billions of people who are excluded from costly frontier models.

Die Massenüberwachung des Geheimdiensts ist unmöglich mit den Grundrechten vereinbar

Die Digitale Gesellschaft — 30/03/2026

Linus' take

"

Die Digitale Gesellschaft hat das Urteil des Bundesverwaltungsgerichtes vom 19. November 2025 mit Genugtuung zur Kenntnis genommen. Noch ist nicht klar ob das Parlament bei der Revision des Gesetzes zur Kabelaufklärung dieses Urteil miteinbezieht. Das Urteil ist nämlich sehr klar und sagt, dass fast alle Punkte des alten Gesetzes eine Massenüberwachung nach dem EGMR darstellen. Dieses Gesetz jetzt auszubauen würde nur bedeuten, dass die Massenüberwachung noch stärker würde.

ThreatsDay Bulletin: PQC Push, AI Vuln Hunting, Pirated Traps, Phishing Kits & 20 More Stories

The Hacker News — 26/03/2026

David's take

"

This bulletin has a bit for everyone, from a PQC migration push to AI-driven exploits abusing tools quietly... so take out the popcorn and make yourselves comfortable. As the author puts it, "Nothing here is shocking on its own. Put together, though, it’s a bit uncomfortable. Scroll on.

Technology Paternalism Expands — A Case for Self-Sovereign Identity

Kosma Concept — 16/03/2026

Katherine's take

"

Finally, the term I've been looking for! Technology paternalism: when technical systems shape, restrict, or pre-decide our choices before we can make them. What strikes me most about this concept is how it finds echoes in so many current political debates—collective goals (safety, security, efficiency) versus individual choice; autonomy versus dependency; who holds power and with what controls. The key issue isn't even necessarily about good versus bad intentions, but about whether we're okay ceding our agency, where we draw the line, and who decides. These questions are hard, philosophically and technically, they're connected, and that's why we have to get them right

spacer C4DT
spacer C4DT
Book Review
spacer C4DT

Solove, Daniel J. (2025) On Privacy and Technology (ISBN: 9780197771686), Oxford University Press, 136 pages.

 

 

In “On Privacy and Technology”, Prof. Solove distils years of rigorous academic research into an accessible analysis that cuts through the noise surrounding privacy debates with surgical precision. What makes this work particularly compelling is Solove’s unflinching exposure of uncomfortable truths: the consent model is fundamentally flawed, self-regulation has failed and cannot succeed, and current privacy frameworks place impossible burdens on individuals while granting companies virtual impunity. Solove systematically dismantles the myths surrounding technology, such as the idea that it is neutral, that it democratizes power and that market forces will self-correct. He reveals how ‘technology rarely equalizes power. Most often, it further empowers the powerful.’ His central argument is devastatingly simple yet profound: we have been asking the wrong questions. Instead of debating whether the law should intervene in technology (it already does), we must determine how to regulate human behavior and corporate power, rather than technical specifications. The book demonstrates that today’s surveillance capitalism does not operate through Orwellian coercion, but rather through engaging interfaces that mask relentless data extraction. In this system, ‘having obtained consent, an organization today can do nearly anything it wants with a person’s data, no matter how bad the consequences might be for the person.’ Solove compellingly argues that meaningful regulation does not stifle innovation, but rather ‘protects companies that innovate thoughtfully and responsibly by preventing those that do not from having an unfair advantage.’ For those navigating the complexities of data protection, this work provides both an intellectual framework and practical ammunition: accountability works; enforcement must be properly funded; and ‘the best thing people could do is to demand that policymakers do something meaningful.’

 

By Olivier Crochat

 

spacer C4DT
spacer C4DT

EPFL-C4DT
Station 14
CH-1015 Lausanne

c4dt@epfl.ch
https://c4dt.epfl.ch
LinkedIn
Mastodon

Web version